State v. Eichenlaub
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 2
Syllabus
The trial court properly overruled the appellant's motion to suppress statements that were not the product of a custodial interrogation. The trial court did not err in refusing to order separate trials where the evidence supporting two separate indictments was simple and distinct. The appellant's convictions are supported by legally sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court· 1990-06-06· cited 1,930×
- State v. HamblinOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 773×
- State v. SchaimOhio Supreme Court· 1992-10-28· cited 617×
- State v. TorresOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-10· cited 471×
- State v. ColeyOhio Supreme Court· 2001-10-03· cited 281×
- State v. ClintonOhio Supreme Court· 2017-12-19· cited 273×
- State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-14· cited 266×
- State v. PrineSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-01-16· cited 67×
- State v. McNealOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-19· cited 8×
- State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-26· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.