Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/16/2009

State v. Prine

Citations

200 P.3d 1
287 Kan. 713
2009 Kan. LEXIS 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding similarity insufficient to admit plan evidence when defendant performed different sex acts with each victim, even though the victims were roughly the same age
holding the state “could not open the door for itself” to prior bad acts evidence by putting up a theory contrary to the defendant’s theory at trial and then using the prior evidence to rebut the state’s theory
evidence failing to meet probative value or materiality element of relevance test is inadmissible
under traditional rubric, admissibility of K.S.A. 60-455 evidence depends on three factors: [1] evidence must be relevant to prove material fact; [2] material fact must be disputed; [3] probative value of evidence must not be substantially outweighed by risk of unfair prej udice
discussing mode of operation theory of “plan”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier, Davis, Johnson, Larson, McAnany, McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.