State v. Egger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stopping a driver for DUII and administering field sobriety tests does not create a “custodial” setting, thus no Miranda warnings are necessary, because there is no danger of compulsory self-incrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Carter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-05-08· cited 62×
• State v. Chaput
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-12-24· cited 5×
• State v. Flury
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-10-25· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Escobedo v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
• State v. Neely
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1965-01-27· cited 151×
• State v. Taylor
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-02-28· cited 29×
• State v. Henson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-11-03· cited 4×
• State v. Ottman
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1965-12-08· cited 3×