State v. Edwards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant’s flight did not support a reasonable inference that defendant knew he had committed the specific crime being investi- gated, because the flight was not tied to any conduct indi- cating knowledge of that offense
• concluding that defendant’s flight did not support a reasonable inference that defendant knew he had committed the specific crime being investi- gated, because the flight was not tied to any conduct indi- cating knowledge of that offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lujano-Rosales
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-03-12· cited 2×
• State v. Guillen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-10-29· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Cunningham
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 277×
• State v. Vasquez-Villagomez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-02-26· cited 41×
• State v. Gressel
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-09-30· cited 36×
• State v. Minchue
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-04-25· cited 15×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-01-15· cited 14×
• State v. MEDINGER
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-04-28· cited 9×