State v. Edstrom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that this court has “repeatedly addressed the admissibility of evidence regarding gas headspace chromatography as performed on first-void urine samples”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Tanksley
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-02-08· cited 5×
• Dereje v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-04-02· cited 2×

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Frye v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
• State v. MacK
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-05-16· cited 207×
• State v. Amos
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-03-27· cited 188×
• State v. Mahkuk
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-08-09· cited 98×
• Goeb v. Tharaldson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-08-17· cited 77×
• State v. Scott
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-08-27· cited 76×
• State v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-07-06· cited 65×
• State v. Ritt
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-08-05· cited 62×
• State v. Jobe
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-06-26· cited 52×
• State v. Klawitter
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-06-30· cited 47×
• State v. Roman Nose
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-08-22· cited 34×
• State v. Hodgson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-02-11· cited 25×
• State v. Reese
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-03-03· cited 25×
• State v. Jensen
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-03-10· cited 15×
• Genung v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-03-02· cited 11×
• Hayes v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-10-06· cited 4×
• State v. Beall
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-08-25· cited 3×
• City of Springfield v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-09-01· cited 2×