Skip to main content

State v. Eckert

Citations

  • 389 A.2d 1234
  • 120 R.I. 560
  • 1978 R.I. LEXIS 705

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming an order denying the plaintiffs motion to adjudge the defendant in contempt for allegedly violating the terms of a preliminary injunction
  • there must be clear proof of a violation of an injunction in order to adjudge a person in contempt of the decree embodying the injunction
  • “The general rule is that to be enforceable by a contempt proceeding, an injunction must be clear and certain, and its terms must be sufficiently detailed to enable one reading the injunc-tive order to understand therefrom what he may not do thereunder.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bevilacqua, Bevüacqua, Joslin, Kelleher, Doris, Weisberger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.