State v. Easton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• face amount of stolen U.S. Treasury check is proof of its value, notwithstanding subsequent stop-payment order, because the instrument “is perhaps the most negotiable of negotiable instruments”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Todd
  Washington Supreme Court· 1970-09-17· cited 95×
• State v. Huff
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-03-12· cited 75×
• State v. Love
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-09-24· cited 60×
• State v. Scott
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-08-12· cited 55×
• Dimmick v. Dimmick
  California Supreme Court· 1962-09-27· cited 53×
• State v. Lee
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-11-09· cited 48×
• State v. McReynolds
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-06-10· cited 34×
• State v. Cottrell
  Washington Supreme Court· 1975-11-26· cited 32×
• United States v. Martin R. Kucik
  Seventh Circuit· 1988-04-21· cited 30×
• State v. Greathouse
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-16· cited 24×
• State v. Greathouse
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-10-18· cited 23×
• State v. Jefferson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1968-11-07· cited 13×
• State v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1974-04-22· cited 11×
• Rosenbruch v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1973-03-15· cited 10×
• State v. Hynds
  Washington Supreme Court· 1974-12-12· cited 7×
• State v. Lampley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-11-07· cited 6×
• State v. Long
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1994-05-17· cited 5×
• State v. Skorpen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-03-02· cited 3×
• State of Washington v. Unters Lewis Love
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-09-24
• State v. Lampley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-02-05