State v. Eason

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding attorney-client privilege could be overcome if defendant meets burden of showing need
• suggesting, at least in the context of a criminal trial where constitutional issues of confrontation are presented, that a defendant may, upon an adeguate showing of need, pierce the attorney-client privilege and review otherwise privileged materials in the possession of a witness
• when police destroyed what they thought was an animal carcass, they did not know victim had been murdered, much less that the defendant murdered him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Napper
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-09-29· cited 207×
• State v. Graf
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-01-15· cited 26×
• State v. Baker
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-04-16· cited 8×
• State v. Newman
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-09-13· cited 7×
• Napper, Ex Parte Lawrence James
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-09-29
• State v. Carl Gibson
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2017-09-21
• WPI V. Meritor
  D. New Hampshire· 1999-09-13

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Arizona v. Youngblood
  Supreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
• State v. Sands
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-08-29· cited 70×
• State v. Thresher
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1982-02-12· cited 43×
• State v. Ramos
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-10-07· cited 30×
• State v. Guay
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1988-05-06· cited 14×