Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 3/21/1986

State v. Earl

Citations

  • 716 P.2d 803
  • 30 Utah Adv. Rep. 3
  • 1986 Utah LEXIS 769

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • inviting argument on the differing scope of protection under the state and federal constitutional search and seizure provisions
  • state constitutional issues, although existent, not considered by Court since not raised; \It is imperative that Utah lawyers brief this Court on relevant state constitutional questions.\
  • “[i]t is imperative that Utah lawyers brief [Utah courts] on relevant state constitutional questions”
  • \'It is imperative that Utah lawyers brief this Court on relevant state constitutional questions.\
  • warrantless search after automobile impounded upheld

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham, Hall, Howe, Zimmerman, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.