State v. Eades
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 5537
Syllabus
The record does not reflect ineffective assistance of counsel based on appellant's attorney's failure to further pursue a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity or failure to pursue withdrawal of a no-contest plea. Counsel initially helped appellant enter an insanity plea. Appellant made his own choice to withdraw the plea after he underwent a psychological evaluation and an expert found him legally sane at the time of his crimes. With regard to the no-contest plea, appellant never expressed a desire to withdraw it. When questioned by the trial court, he reaffirmed his desire to keep the plea in place. The record further reflects that appellant's no-contest plea was entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. Finally, the record does not clearly and convincingly fail to support the appellant's individual sentences or the trial court's findings in support of partially consecutive sentences. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-08-24· cited 291×
- State v. Thompson, Jr.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-24· cited 20×
- State v. FolkOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-06· cited 12×
- State v. ColemanOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-07· cited 4×
- State v. TaborOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.