Utah Supreme Court· 9/15/1977
State v. Durand
Citations
- 569 P.2d 1107
- 1977 Utah LEXIS 1251
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the 22 Cite as: 2022 UT 9 Opinion of the Court rebuttable presumption of prejudice was not triggered when jurors briefly had coffee at the sheriff‘s office in the presence of several officer-witnesses, as it was a ―minor‖ showing of impropriety
- where jurors went to sheriffs office for coffee and engaged in casual conversation with officers who were witnesses for the state, court held conversation inconsequential because it was not connected to trial
- where jurors went to sheriff's office for coffee and engaged in casual conversation with officers who were witnesses for the state, court held conversation inconsequential because it was not connected to trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crockett, Ellett, Wilkins, Hall, Maughan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court· 1993-01-07· cited 251×
- State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court· 2002-12-20· cited 136×
- State v. PikeUtah Supreme Court· 1985-12-30· cited 40×
- State v. LaroccoCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1987-08-27· cited 27×
- Logan City v. CarlsenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1990-10-04· cited 13×
- State v. One Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars, United States CurrencyUtah Supreme Court· 1997-07-18· cited 5×
- State v. 175,800 DOLLARS, US CURRENCYUtah Supreme Court· 1997-07-18
- State v. SotoUtah Supreme Court· 2022-02-17
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- Albert Douglas Davis v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1964-01-17· cited 241×
- Jacob v. New York CitySupreme Court· 1942-03-30· cited 213×
- State v. ShoemakerWashington Supreme Court· 1975-03-20· cited 70×
- People v. PearsonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1976-03-08· cited 49×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1975-02-10· cited 30×
- State v. MorganUtah Supreme Court· 1901-02-02· cited 29×
- State v. TuttleUtah Supreme Court· 1965-03-09· cited 26×
- State v. EastmondUtah Supreme Court· 1972-07-11· cited 26×
- People v. WieckertSupreme Court of Colorado· 1976-09-07· cited 23×
- Burkham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1975-07-18· cited 21×
- State v. BidegainNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-07-02· cited 11×
- State v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1976-06-07· cited 8×
- Lee Wing Chau v. Fusae K. NagaiHawaii Supreme Court· 1960-06-07· cited 7×
- State v. SimpsonUtah Supreme Court· 1975-10-24· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.