Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 9/15/1977

State v. Durand

Citations

  • 569 P.2d 1107
  • 1977 Utah LEXIS 1251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the 22 Cite as: 2022 UT 9 Opinion of the Court rebuttable presumption of prejudice was not triggered when jurors briefly had coffee at the sheriff‘s office in the presence of several officer-witnesses, as it was a ―minor‖ showing of impropriety
  • where jurors went to sheriffs office for coffee and engaged in casual conversation with officers who were witnesses for the state, court held conversation inconsequential because it was not connected to trial
  • where jurors went to sheriff's office for coffee and engaged in casual conversation with officers who were witnesses for the state, court held conversation inconsequential because it was not connected to trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crockett, Ellett, Wilkins, Hall, Maughan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.