Skip to main content

State v. Duran

Citations

  • 960 A.2d 697
  • 158 N.H. 146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘We believe there are principles of law the Hamum court did not consider . . . [and] recognize [that] the vast majority of jurisdictions have decided to the contrary . . . .”
  • “[A]n interpretation that renders statutory language superfluous and irrelevant is not a proper interpretation.”
  • “Under the second . . . factor, we inquire into ‘the cost of a rule’s repudiation as it would fall on those who have relied reasonably on the rule’s continued application.’” (emphasis added)
  • referring to the same or similar passages in Duran
  • outlining elements of accomplice liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Broderick, Dalianis, Duggan, Galway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.