State v. Dupere

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that claimants against the state do not have a right to trial de novo, but Appellate Rule 609 gives the superior court discretion to order a trial de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Conam Alaska v. Bell Lavalin, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1992-11-27· cited 60×
• Keyes v. Humana Hospital Alaska, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1988-02-19· cited 51×
• Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2007-09-07· cited 41×
• Bartley v. State, Department of Administration, Teachers' Retirement Board
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2005-04-15· cited 33×
• Jaso v. McCarthy
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1996-09-20· cited 30×
• Standard Alaska Production Co. v. State, Department of Revenue
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1989-04-21· cited 25×
• State v. Patterson
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1987-07-31· cited 25×
• Eufemio v. Kodiak Island Hospital
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1992-07-24· cited 23×
• Tommy's Elbow Room, Inc. v. Kavorkian
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1988-04-22· cited 13×
• In re A.S.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1987-07-17· cited 4×
• Matter of As
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1987-07-17

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Lundgren Pacific Const. Co., Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-11-30· cited 39×
• State v. Dupere
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1986-02-10· cited 17×