Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1/26/2000
State v. Duncan
Citations
- 605 N.W.2d 745
- 2000 Minn. App. LEXIS 116
- 2000 WL 109048
Judges: Short, Crippen, Holtan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,779×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-08-28· cited 59×
- State v. SuessSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1952-03-14· cited 57×
- State v. WicklundSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-11· cited 55×
- State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Diversified Theatrical Corp.Michigan Supreme Court· 1976-04-01· cited 54×
- State v. WelkeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-03-01· cited 52×
- Besig v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1953-10-23· cited 37×
- State v. EndSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1950-12-22· cited 37×
- Koppinger v. City of FairmontSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-11-26· cited 30×
- State v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-02-28· cited 27×
- State Ex Rel. Wayne Prosecutor v. Diversified Theatrical Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1975-03-04· cited 26×
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-11· cited 18×
- City of Seattle v. MarshallWashington Supreme Court· 1974-04-25· cited 15×
- Tahiti Bar, Incorporated Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-06-11· cited 12×
- State v. HolmbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-03-26· cited 9×
- State v. FanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-09-05· cited 9×
- State v. SchramelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-07-21· cited 5×
- In Re the Welfare of C.S.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-12-20· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.