Missouri Court of Appeals· 3/3/2009
State v. Duff
Citations
- 281 S.W.3d 320
- 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 253
- 2009 WL 507364
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting individually-wrapped bags of marijuana supported the reasonable inference the bags were intended for distribution
- fact that drugs were “individually-wrapped” was probative of intent to distribute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Div, Hardwick, Howard, Dandurand
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PurleeSupreme Court of Missouri· 1992-10-27· cited 237×
- State v. SladekSupreme Court of Missouri· 1992-06-30· cited 206×
- State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Missouri· 2002-02-26· cited 125×
- State v. WurtzbergerSupreme Court of Missouri· 2001-03-06· cited 90×
- State v. LloydMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-11-27· cited 41×
- State v. FlenoySupreme Court of Missouri· 1998-05-26· cited 38×
- State v. BradshawMissouri Court of Appeals· 2000-08-01· cited 27×
- State v. McQuaryMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-10-18· cited 25×
- State v. McCleodMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-03-21· cited 25×
- State v. BaconMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-01-11· cited 21×
- State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2008-02-19· cited 15×
- State v. SalyerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1994-08-31· cited 9×
- State v. MizanskeyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1995-04-04· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.