State v. Driver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An unconstitutional act designed to amend or supersede an existing law does not repeal or change the former valid act but leaves it in full force and effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Swanson
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1999-10-04· cited 433×
• B.H. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-11-23· cited 86×
• People v. District Court
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1992-06-29· cited 56×
• Edwards v. Allen
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2007-03-02· cited 54×
• Tennessee Baptist Children's Homes, Inc. v. Swanson
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1999-10-04· cited 11×
• State v. Mark Spencer King
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-09-18
• BH v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-11-23
• State v. Neely
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-01-11
• State of Tennessee v. Kaylecia Woodard
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2017-06-15
• State v. Lawyer
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1981-04-16

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Mullaney v. Wilbur
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
• Tot v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1943-06-07· cited 998×
• Morrison v. California
  Supreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 381×
• United States v. Romano
  Supreme Court· 1965-11-22· cited 366×
• State v. Dixon
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1975-11-17· cited 33×