Skip to main content
· 3/2/2007

Edwards v. Allen

Citations

  • 216 S.W.3d 278
  • 2007 Tenn. LEXIS 144
  • 2007 WL 625375

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the chancellor concluded that the suit was filed after the ten-year statute of limitations, the longest possible period”
  • county board of commission may not rezone property unless planning commission has first considered zoning change
  • “It is clear that void still means void and lapse of time cannot validate an ordinance [or order] void ab initio.”
  • “Because the ordinance is void ab initio, a statute of limitations is no defense.”
  • “Because the altered amendment was substantial and was not returned to the planning commission for further consideration, the Rutherford County Board of Commission had no jurisdiction to rezone ninety acres when the public notice described ten.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice Gary R. Wade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.