State v. Drane
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 4624
Syllabus
Following a bench trial, appellant was convicted of murder and other offenses. Inadmissible hearsay testimony was not admitted at trial and, as such, appellant's assertion that his right to confront witnesses was violated is without merit. The trial court did not improperly allow the State to determine the admissibility of purported hearsay testimony. The State presented sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions. Counsel did not provide ineffective assistance. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court· 2011-02-28· cited 1,277×
- State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-09-13· cited 457×
- State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-08-24· cited 291×
- City of Cleveland v. WelmsOhio Court of Appeals· 2006-12-07· cited 52×
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-13· cited 6×
- State v. HawkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-24· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.