State v. Drane
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 4624
Syllabus
Following a bench trial, appellant was convicted of murder and other offenses. Inadmissible hearsay testimony was not admitted at trial and, as such, appellant's assertion that his right to confront witnesses was violated is without merit. The trial court did not improperly allow the State to determine the admissibility of purported hearsay testimony. The State presented sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions. Counsel did not provide ineffective assistance. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.