Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/6/2026

State v. Dominguez-Olivia

Citations

2026 Ohio 754

Syllabus

Neither appellant's statutory nor his constitutional speedy trial rights were violated. Appellant's due process rights were not violated by the delay between his criminal activity and the indictment. Appellant's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
State v. Jenks
Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
United States v. Marion
Supreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 3,756×
State v. O'Brien
Ohio Supreme Court· 1987-12-09· cited 264×
State v. Adams
Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-05-17· cited 247×
State v. Luck
Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-12-31· cited 234×
State v. Walls
Ohio Supreme Court· 2002-10-09· cited 195×
State v. Baker
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-04-02· cited 169×
State v. Whiting
Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-12-30· cited 140×
State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-07-27· cited 120×
State v. Farra
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-29· cited 39×
State v. Rastbichler
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-21· cited 28×
State v. Knott
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-07· cited 13×
State v. Taylor
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-06· cited 4×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.