State v. Dominguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• A.R.S. § 13-3419 is “the exclusive sentencing provision for multiple drug offenses not committed on the same occasion but consolidated for trial.”
• no fundamental error in failure to give Dessureault jury instruction when trial court made no determination “that an out-of-court identification procedure was unduly suggestive” and when “defendant failed to request a Dessureault hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• O'BRIEN v. Escher
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-08-02· cited 23×
• State v. Leyvas
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-03-30· cited 22×
• State v. Francis
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-04-22· cited 4×
• State v. Zazueta Garcia
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2023-12-05· cited 2×
• State of Arizona v. Christopher Wayne Francis
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-04-22
• State of Arizona v. Nathan Andres Leyvas
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-03-30
• Jeremy Sean O'Brien v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-03-24

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Dessureault
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-04-30· cited 227×
• State v. Gulbrandson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 189×
• State v. Noriega
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-12-17· cited 62×
• State v. Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-02-09· cited 47×
• State v. Ojeda
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1989-01-10· cited 47×
• In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JA 33794
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-09-26· cited 30×
• State v. Aro
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-04-24· cited 12×
• State v. Harris
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-03-27· cited 11×
• State v. Lockett
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-12-08· cited 10×
• State v. Osorio
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-02-26· cited 6×