State v. Doe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• despite appellant’s testimony that she would participate in treatment on a voluntary basis, court did not find that she was likely to do so
• sufficient evidence in the record that the appellant was not likely to participate in treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Olsen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-10-18· cited 27×
• State v. Lott
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-10-26· cited 26×
• State v. T. M.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-01· cited 8×
• State v. Brenhuber
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-03-05· cited 6×
• State v. C. A. J.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-08-05· cited 5×
• State v. D. F.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-02-28· cited 4×
• State v. TM
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-01
• In Re Caj
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-08-05
• State v. DF
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-02-28

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• O'Neill v. O'Neill
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-01-22· cited 153×
• State v. Weyeneth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-10-14· cited 4×