State v. Brenhuber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The trial court did not err in applying a preponderance of the evidence standard of proof in the dispositional phase of appellant’s mental commitment proceeding.”
• “[W]e have held that in the dispositional phase of a mental commitment proceeding the proper standard of proof is a preponderance of the evidence.”
• “[I]n the dispositional phase of a mental commitment proceeding the proper standard of proof is a preponderance of the evidence.”
• \[W]e have held that in the dispositional phase of a mental commitment proceeding the proper standard of proof is a preponderance of the evidence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).