Skip to main content

State v. Doe

Citations

  • 674 P.2d 1109
  • 100 N.M. 649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the statute only requires consideration of child’s amenability — not a specific finding
  • holding statute which required consideration, rather than a finding, of amenability was constitutional
  • holding statute which required consideration, rather than a finding, of amenability was constitutional
  • the fact that the children’s court heard evidence of the advantages and disadvantages of two alternatives was indicative that it had considered the matter within the provisions of the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riordan, Donnelly, Payne, Federici, Stowers, Sosa, Wood, Bivens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.