State v. Dizon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that jury instruction referring to reasonable doubt as a “substantial doubt” was a “sole misstatement” in light of the instructions as a whole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hansen
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1995-09-19· cited 38×
• State v. Andrews
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-11-24· cited 30×
• State v. Peters
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-04-02· cited 27×
• State v. Hall
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-11-13· cited 17×
• State v. Cruz
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1994-03-29· cited 5×
• State v. DeWitt
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-08-18· cited 4×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Golding
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
• Cage v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1990-11-13· cited 1,172×
• Gaskins v. McKellar, Warden, Et Al.
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-03· cited 83×
• State v. Negron
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-03-03· cited 73×
• State v. Fernandez
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-03-17· cited 37×
• State v. Toczko
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-11-20· cited 14×