State v. Dixon

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 5668

Syllabus

Per Mayle, J., the trial court made all three consecutive sentence findings required under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) at the sentencing hearing but failed to include its finding under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)(c) in its sentencing judgment entry, so appellant's sentence is reversed and remanded for the limited purpose of entering a nunc pro tunc judgment entry that incorporates the trial court's R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)(c) finding.