State v. Dillard
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4842
Syllabus
The state charged appellant with committing the offenses of menacing by stalking \on or about\ April 24, 2016 and was provided or permitted to inspect requested discovery which included police reports and recordings of 911 call and police interviews. Therefore, the trial court did not err in considering evidence of appellant's actions on April 25, 2016 to establish a \pattern of conduct.\ The state charged appellant with attempted burglary and therefore was not required to prove appellant entered the home, rather, was only required to prove appellant knowingly engaged in conduct that, if successful, would have constituted entering the victim's home. Accordingly, the judgments were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgments affirmed.
Judges: Dorrian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.