Skip to main content
· 11/30/2021

State v. Daylong

Citations

  • 181 N.E.3d 1245
  • 2021 Ohio 4192

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in the admission of other-acts evidence, sufficient evidence and the manifest weight of the evidence supports Daylong's convictions, the trial court did not err in instructing the jury or in preventing Daylong from arguing to the jury the meaning of the term \public\ as used in R.C. 2909.04(A)(2), and the admission of the evidence of Daylong's prior criminal conviction did not constitute plain error.

Judges: Luper Schuster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.