State v. Dickson
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 228
Syllabus
Enforce subpoena stipulate at trial ineffective assistance of counsel stipulated testimony trial strategy and failure to call a witness. The trial court did not err when it accepted a report stipulated to by both parties rather than requiring the drafter of the report to present live testimony. The appellant was not subject to ineffective assistance of counsel when defense counsel introduced a stipulated report rather than live witness testimony. Further, defense counsel's failure to call two witnesses at trial was not ineffective assistance of counsel. Defense counsel's decision not to call the two witnesses amounted to trial strategy, and the record shows the witness testimony would not have reasonably resulted in a different outcome at trial.
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,113×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1956-01-23· cited 2,788×
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1988-03-28· cited 1,952×
- Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-12-05· cited 1,308×
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court· 2001-01-03· cited 1,260×
- State v. Pickens (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-12-16· cited 130×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 1992-09-09· cited 43×
- State v. LinderOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-09-27· cited 9×
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-26· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.