State v. Dick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[t]he first prong of Venetie, federal set-aside, seems to obviate, to some extent, the need for defining the relevant community”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Frank
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2002-07-24· cited 28×
• Dark-Eyes v. Commissioner of Revenue Services
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-01-03· cited 21×
• State v. Quintana
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-01-25· cited 10×
• State v. Frank
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-03-28· cited 10×
• United States v. M.C.
  D. New Mexico· 2004-03-24· cited 9×
• State v. Cruz
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-10-27· cited 8×
• Thompson v. County of Franklin
  N.D. New York· 2000-12-26· cited 8×
• State v. Steven B.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2015-06-25· cited 4×
• State v. Steven B.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-04-01· cited 3×
• State v. Steven B.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2013-07-12· cited 1×
• State v. Quintana
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-06-15· cited 1×
• State v. Cruz
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-01-25

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Kagama
  Supreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 738×
• Williams v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1946-04-01· cited 224×
• Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government
  Supreme Court· 1998-02-25· cited 175×
• United States v. McGowan
  Supreme Court· 1938-01-03· cited 174×
• United States v. Pelican
  Supreme Court· 1914-02-24· cited 169×
• Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Co. v. Watchman
  Tenth Circuit· 1995-04-19· cited 68×
• State v. Munoz
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-09-25· cited 46×
• C. M. G. v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1979-05-01· cited 17×
• State v. Ortiz
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-12-23· cited 15×
• State v. Frank
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-08-28· cited 6×