State v. DICAPUA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the trial court erred in granting a motion for a new trial on a ground not raised by a party—specifically, the admission of an unobjected-to videotape
• finding a trial court cannot sua sponte grant a new trial on a ground not raised by a party and reversing the trial court’s grant of a new trial based on the admission of an unobjected to videotape

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Burke v. AnMed Health
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-04-27· cited 30×
• State v. Sheppard
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-02-07· cited 28×
• Winters v. FIDDIE
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-08-31· cited 10×
• Temple, J., Aplt. v. Providence Care Center
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-07-21

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Dicapua
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-04-23· cited 19×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-12-17· cited 18×
• Southern Railway Co. v. Coltex, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-04-04· cited 7×