State v. Diaz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a judge's comment on evidence is error where prejudicial
• applying Arizona’s constitutional prejudice test and holding that the trial judge’s comment on the evidence in violation of Article 6, Section 27 was not prejudicial, requiring reversal
• applying Arizona's constitutional prejudice test and holding that the trial judge's comment on the evidence in violation of Article 6, Section 27 was not prejudicial, requiring reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Readenour v. Marion Power Shovel
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-05-12· cited 79×
• Jones v. Munn
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-04-09· cited 11×
• State v. Escobedo
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-08-11· cited 4×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Arce
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-04-22· cited 46×
• State v. Dutton
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1957-11-26· cited 46×
• State v. Vann
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-01-02· cited 27×
• State v. Godsoe
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-09-30· cited 24×
• People v. Campuzano
  California Court of Appeal· 1967-08-31· cited 22×
• People v. Robbins
  California Court of Appeal· 1964-02-27· cited 21×
• State v. Brooks
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1968-10-09· cited 16×
• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-02-24· cited 15×