Hawaii Supreme Court· 2/25/1985

State v. Delmondo

Citations

696 P.2d 344
67 Haw. 531
1985 Haw. LEXIS 74

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that where the court made an affirmative finding that the defendant was a repeat offender, it \was duty bound to impose a mandatory minimum sentence\ (emphasis added)
holding that where the court made an affirmative finding that the defendant was a repeat offender, it “ivas duty bound to impose a mandatory minimum sentence ” (emphasis added)
holding trial court had duty to impose mandatory minimum sentence upon defendant as a repeat offender when that fact was made evident to the court following initial sentencing
noting when a sentence imposed does not comply with statutory requirements, the sentence is illegal
“If [the defendant] is found to be a repeat offender, the sentencing court is bound to impose the applicable mandatory minimum term of imprisonment.”
There may be circumstances under which it may violate due process to correct even an illegal sentence.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Pádgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.