Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/31/2025
State v. Dees
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 294
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in imposing financial sanctions under R.C. 2743.70. The court reasonably concluded that appellant would have the ability to pay $120 in costs to the state reparations fund, notwithstanding its appointment of counsel for appellant based on his indigency. Judgments affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- United States v. MarcusSupreme Court· 2010-05-24· cited 935×
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 2004-02-11· cited 410×
- State v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-10-19· cited 17×
- State v. WillisOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-01-27· cited 16×
- State v. BrillOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-13· cited 14×
- State v. HullOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-29· cited 13×
- State v. SwartzOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-23· cited 5×
- State v. ParksOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-18· cited 5×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-22· cited 2×
- State v. WertmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-02· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.