Skip to main content

State v. Decker

Citations

  • 239 Ariz. 29
  • 365 P.3d 954
  • 729 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 4
  • 2016 Ariz. App. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that although “‘lack of general information’ is generally an unpersuasive rationale for striking a prospective juror,” the rationale alone does not show purposeful racial discrimination
  • explaining that where prosecutor’s argument correctly stated Arizona law, court did not err by overruling objection to it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cattani, Johnsen, Gemmill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.