Skip to main content

State v. Dean

Citations

  • 298 Kan. 1023
  • 324 P.3d 1023
  • 2014 WL 800452
  • 2014 Kan. LEXIS 105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting this court had not yet been asked to decide whether the amended statute requires conducting the same balancing test as under the previous statute
  • in determining risk of undue prejudice did not outweigh probative value, \court did not admit extensive evidence or graphic detail about the prior conviction\
  • specifically noting that an objection on hearsay grounds does not equate to an objection on confrontation grounds and holding that the failure to object on confrontation grounds precluded appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moritz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.