State v. Day
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1999
Syllabus
Upon appellant's admission to a violation of community control sanctions, the trial court revoked community control and sentenced appellant to prison. Appellant claims that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to make a statement in mitigation at sentencing. Nothing in the record indicates that appellant's counsel did not act within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance. The failure to present evidence in mitigation is not the proper subject of a direct appeal, because the proof of such omitted evidence necessarily lies outside the record. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Hanseman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court· 2011-04-04· cited 5,931×
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,113×
- State v. KeithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-01· cited 485×
- Thornell v. JonesSupreme Court· 2024-05-30· cited 26×
- State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-11· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.