Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/10/2024
State v. Dawson
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1806
Syllabus
Sulek, J., writing for the majority, affirms the trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences as not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record.
Judges: Sulek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. BeasleyOhio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 310×
- State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court· 2023-10-25· cited 232×
- State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-23· cited 142×
- State v. Moore (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-08-14· cited 38×
- McKinney v. Haviland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-10-07· cited 12×
- State v. SipperleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-25· cited 10×
- State v. CurtisOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-20· cited 9×
- State v. CardwellOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-30· cited 7×
- State v. NeffOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-22· cited 5×
- State v. TillisOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-06· cited 3×
- State v. BarnhartOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-26· cited 3×
- State v. McDonaldOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-22· cited 2×
- State ex rel. Scott v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-10-18· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.