State v. Davis
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2511
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in overruling appellant's motion to suppress. The police officer reasonably concluded, based on his observations, that appellant had committed traffic violations, namely parking in the middle of the roadway and failing to signal a turn. Appellant also was intoxicated, belligerent, and smelled of an alcoholic beverage when he was stopped. The gun in his vehicle was in plain view on the passenger seat. After the motion to suppress was overruled, appellant was properly convicted for improper handling of a firearm in a motor vehicle and OVI following his no contest pleas. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- City of Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court· 1996-07-03· cited 850×
- State v. EvansOhio Supreme Court· 1993-09-22· cited 502×
- State v. MaysOhio Supreme Court· 2008-09-16· cited 383×
- State v. ClayOhio Supreme Court· 1973-06-20· cited 164×
- City of Bowling Green v. GodwinOhio Supreme Court· 2006-07-26· cited 120×
- State v. MillertonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-09· cited 27×
- State v. OlsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-04· cited 15×
- State v. GoodeOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-03-15· cited 10×
- State v. MobleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-03· cited 10×
- State v. GarrettOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-09· cited 9×
- State v. MylesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-31· cited 7×
- State v. FinfrockOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-27· cited 3×
- City of Carmel v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-07-05· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.