Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/28/2007
State v. Davis
Citations
- 156 P.3d 93
- 211 Or. App. 550
- 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 401
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- driving records not testimonial because they are not maintained for the primary purpose of eriminal investigations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Schuman, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ShipleySupreme Court of Iowa· 2008-07-18· cited 30×
- People v. EspinozaColorado Court of Appeals· 2008-05-29· cited 19×
- State v. VelykoretskykhCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-01-28· cited 16×
- State v. DukesCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-01-18· cited 14×
- State v. LeibelNebraska Supreme Court· 2013-10-25· cited 10×
- State v. SeriniCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-03-19· cited 2×
- State of Tennessee v. Pascasio MartinezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2017-11-21
- State Of Iowa Vs. Bradley Dale ShipleySupreme Court of Iowa· 2008-07-18
- State v. KelseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-04-11
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.