State v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “statements obtained through subterfuge are admissible unless the deception offends societal notions of fairness or is likely to procure an untrustworthy confession”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Faruqi
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2011-08-02· cited 42×
• State v. Davis
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-10-17· cited 37×
• State v. Hill
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-03-04· cited 22×
• State v. Jackson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-02-20· cited 15×
• State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Rickey Bates
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2015-06-16· cited 14×
• State of Missouri v. Daaron Harris
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2015-09-22· cited 13×
• State v. Cook
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2002-02-11· cited 11×
• State v. Mitchell
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-08-30· cited 9×
• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-09-13· cited 8×
• State v. Clark
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-08-29· cited 8×
• STATE OF MISSOURI v. CALVIN L. TRENT
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2020-12-15

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• State v. Debler
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1993-06-29· cited 113×
• State v. Powell
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1990-11-20· cited 82×
• State v. Wilson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1988-07-26· cited 27×
• State v. Heyer
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-01-20· cited 11×