State v. David

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an accused has the right to the due process requirements of notice and an opportunity to be heard and the right to counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Elliott
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-12-07· cited 43×
• Garcia v. Village of Tijeras
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-10-11· cited 41×
• State v. Roybal
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-04-28· cited 27×
• State of Tennessee v. Latickia Tashay Burgins
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2015-04-07· cited 27×
• State v. Brown
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2014-11-06· cited 22×
• State v. Segura
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2014-01-21· cited 11×
• State v. Brown
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2014-11-06· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Murphy v. Hunt
  Supreme Court· 1982-04-26· cited 1,805×
• State v. Lankford
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1978-07-25· cited 111×
• City of Raton v. Sproule
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-06-19· cited 53×
• Hunt v. Roth
  Eighth Circuit· 1981-05-13· cited 51×
• State v. Flores
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-11-03· cited 40×
• Tijerina v. Baker
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-01-16· cited 31×
• Huihui v. Shimoda
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1982-05-17· cited 25×
• State Ex Rel. Witt v. State Canvassing Board
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-02-05· cited 23×
• State ex rel. Sedillo v. Sargent
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1918-03-05· cited 20×
• State v. Romero
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-08-14· cited 6×