Skip to main content
· 12/1/1993

State v. Dathan Chung

Citations

  • 862 P.2d 1063
  • 75 Haw. 398
  • 1993 Haw. LEXIS 54

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a defendant's statements to other teachers that he would kill the principal were true threats entitled to no First Amendment protection
  • recognizing that a defendant’s statements to other teachers that he would kill the principal were true threats entitled to no First Amendment protection
  • recognizing that a defendant's statements to other teachers that he would kill the principal were true threats entitled to no First Amendment protection
  • remanding a case for further proceedings on two counts of terroristic threatening and one count of possession or use of a firearm in the commission of a felony
  • remanding a case for further proceedings on two counts of terroristic threatening and one count of possession or use of a firearm in the commission of a felony
  • statements made to third parties constituted true threat when they \were sufficiently alarming to impel [the third parties] to transmit them to [the target of the threat] and for the police to be notified\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, Moon, Klein, Levinson, Hayashi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.