Skip to main content
· 11/21/1996

State v. Ontai

Citations

  • 929 P.2d 69
  • 84 Haw. 56
  • 1996 Haw. LEXIS 159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the federal and Hawaii state RICO statues are “virtually identical” and that Hawaii courts “resort to federal case law” when applying the state RICO statute
  • discussing a conclusion of law, but evaluating the evidence presented to the grand jury de novo
  • discussing a conclusion of law, but evaluating the evidence presented to the grand jury de novo
  • “[F]ederal law is an important aid to construction because HRS § 842-2 was derived from the federal ... statute.”
  • “[T]he most useful source in interpreting HRS § 842-2(3) is federal law.”
  • “Probable cause is established by ‘a state of facts as would lead a person of ordinary caution or prudence to believe and conscientiously entertain a strong suspicion of the guilt of the accused.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.