· 11/21/1996
State v. Ontai
Citations
- 929 P.2d 69
- 84 Haw. 56
- 1996 Haw. LEXIS 159
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the federal and Hawaii state RICO statues are “virtually identical” and that Hawaii courts “resort to federal case law” when applying the state RICO statute
- discussing a conclusion of law, but evaluating the evidence presented to the grand jury de novo
- discussing a conclusion of law, but evaluating the evidence presented to the grand jury de novo
- “[F]ederal law is an important aid to construction because HRS § 842-2 was derived from the federal ... statute.”
- “[T]he most useful source in interpreting HRS § 842-2(3) is federal law.”
- “Probable cause is established by ‘a state of facts as would lead a person of ordinary caution or prudence to believe and conscientiously entertain a strong suspicion of the guilt of the accused.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.