Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/24/1980
State v. Darnell
Citations
- 49 Or. App. 461
- 619 P.2d 1321
- 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3730
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allegations of the petition must be reasonably clear and definite
- allegations of the petition must be reasonably clear and definite
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Joseph, Warren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- State v. KrummacherOregon Supreme Court· 1974-06-27· cited 170×
- State v. JamisonOregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-26· cited 94×
- State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 82×
- State v. Amos BranchOregon Supreme Court· 1966-06-22· cited 61×
- State v. JamisonOregon Supreme Court· 1968-09-05· cited 42×
- State v. StandardOregon Supreme Court· 1962-10-24· cited 11×
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. HayworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-07-05· cited 7×
- State v. RayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-10-02· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.