Skip to main content
· 4/10/1976

State v. Danko

Citations

  • 548 P.2d 819
  • 219 Kan. 490
  • 1976 Kan. LEXIS 389

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \technical violation\ of the PCA, where MP searched a civilian vehicle, did not warrant application of the extraordinary remedy of exclusion
  • although court found violation of Posse Comitatus Act where military officer, on joint patrol with civilian police officer, assisted in search of automobile occupied by defendant, no exclusionary rule applied because first instance in State of Kansas of violation of Act
  • Act may be violated despite officers' apparent ignorance of Act's proscription
  • Act may be violated despite officers’ apparent ignorance of Act’s proscription

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaul

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.