State v. Danforth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the threats must be evaluated in the context of the offender’s conduct, i.e., the offender’s history and mental condition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Detention of Danforth
  Washington Supreme Court· 2011-11-10· cited 27×
• In Re Detention of Aston
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-05-16· cited 12×
• In re the Detention of Aston
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-05-16· cited 12×

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kolender v. Lawson
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 3,306×
• Roberts v. United States Jaycees
  Supreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 2,030×
• National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co.
  Supreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 1,047×
• Watts v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-04-21· cited 977×
• City of Spokane v. Douglass
  Washington Supreme Court· 1990-08-23· cited 388×
• State v. White
  Washington Supreme Court· 1982-02-18· cited 340×
• Hertog v. City of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-06-24· cited 309×
• HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-06-24· cited 302×
• State v. Kilburn
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-02-12· cited 170×
• State v. Williams
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-06-28· cited 160×
• Sheikh v. Choe
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-02-16· cited 134×
• Aba Sheikh v. Choe
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-02-16· cited 130×
• State v. Johnston
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-01-26· cited 69×
• Huff v. Budbill
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-06-08· cited 55×
• State v. Tellez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-10-29· cited 35×
• In Re Detention of Lewis
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-02-28· cited 24×
• In re the Detention of Lewis
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-02-28· cited 24×
• City of Redmond v. Burkhart
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-01-24· cited 16×