Court of Appeals of Washington· 5/9/2006
State v. Dalseg
Citations
- 132 Wash. App. 854
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the abuse of discretion standard of review to sentencing violation orders
- “[w]hen an offender violates any requirement of a sentence, the trial court retains broad discretion to modify the sentence and/or impose additional punishment”
- applying Roach's guidelines and analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Houghton, Penoyar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- State v. ShoveWashington Supreme Court· 1989-07-13· cited 112×
- United States v. Frank MartinezNinth Circuit· 1988-01-21· cited 93×
- Donald Wayne Green v. Robert Christiansen, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Lompoc, CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1984-05-08· cited 86×
- Smith v. SwopeNinth Circuit· 1937-06-30· cited 84×
- State v. BryantWashington Supreme Court· 2002-04-04· cited 32×
- In Re RoachWashington Supreme Court· 2003-08-14· cited 20×
- In re the Personal Restraint of RoachWashington Supreme Court· 2003-08-14· cited 19×
- State v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-05-01· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.