State v. Daley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[t]he effect of [the] repeal was, for the most obvious reason, that the law, as to any proceedings under it which were not past and closed, must be considered as if it had never existed’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. . Hayes
  New York Court of Appeals· 1894-01-16· cited 80×
• Vance v. Rankin
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1902-02-21· cited 49×
• State v. Bischoff
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-01-15· cited 32×
• State v. Smith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1910-03-15· cited 28×
• State v. Graham
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-02-01· cited 17×
• American Railroad Co. v. Hernández
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1905-06-01· cited 11×
• Monaco v. Matarrese
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1936-12-30· cited 10×
• State v. Menditto
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-12-24· cited 5×
• People v. McNulty
  California Supreme Court· 1891-12-12· cited 3×
• Shepherd v. People
  New York Court of Appeals· 1862-09-15· cited 3×
• State v. Meader
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1890-05-15· cited 1×
• State v. Kalil
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-11-25
• State v. Bischoff
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-08-31
• Shepherd v. People
  New York Court of Appeals· 1862-12-15
• One Elmcroft Stamford, LLC v. Zoning Board of Appeals
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2022-06-14
• McDowell v. Fuller
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1915-01-04
• American Railroad v. Hernández
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1905-06-01