State v. Daley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing trial court’s deci- sion whether to grant substitution of counsel for abuse of discretion
• “We review a request for substitute appointed counsel for abuse of discretion.”
• “A legitimate complaint * * * is one that is based on an abridgement of a criminal defendant’s constitutional right to counsel. The right to coun- sel requires adequate performance of an appointed lawyer’s professional assistance.” (Internal quotation marks omit- ted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wampler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-05-03· cited 7×
• State v. Hernandez-Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-04-09· cited 7×
• State v. Coleman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-09-04· cited 1×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-03-18· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gideon v. Wainwright
  Supreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
• Krummacher v. Gierloff
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-04-21· cited 232×
• State v. Langley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-09-17· cited 134×
• State v. Langley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-11-18· cited 86×
• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-12-31· cited 82×
• State v. Smith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-11-18· cited 41×
• State v. Heaps
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-09-23· cited 18×
• State v. Olson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-07-10· cited 11×
• Knox v. Nooth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-06-29· cited 6×
• Goodlette v. Causey
  Coos County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-22· cited 2×